Great post. Thanks for the
Great post. Thanks for the useful info. One off-topic question - What tool did you use for graphics to visualize three results?
View ArticleI'm not convince by this
I'm not convince by this benchmark.You are not comparing JAXB against stax, because in each 3 tests you're using JAXB and Stax : 1) jaxb uses stax under the cover for reading the stream (There is no...
View ArticleHi Oleg, I used Excel 2010
Hi Oleg, I used Excel 2010 graphs.Glad you found the article useful
View ArticleSeb, you are quite right when
Seb, you are quite right when you say I don't compare JAXB and STax as technologies, but rather as approaches. My article is not about benchmarking the Java API (for that the excellent engineers at...
View ArticleHi Marco,I think that
Hi Marco,I think that Woodstox 4.1 outperforms the others in speed. Try to run your tests replacing only the Woodstox jars with latest version (4.1)
View ArticleThanks for the article. Can
Thanks for the article. Can we assume the same conclusion for "Marshalling"? Is there any reason to think that Marshalling a large Java object base into an XML document would behave differently than...
View ArticleExcellent article, thank you
Excellent article, thank you very much for the work posting this, exactly what I was looking for. The question which I still have, is about scaling. Which one scales the best?
View ArticleOne benefit of the JAXB
One benefit of the JAXB technology is that it hides the details and gets rid of the extraneous relationships in SAX and DOM JAXB classes describe only the relationships actually defined in the source...
View Article